Aug 20 2009
Stones
The Experiment
To test our ability or desire to impose order on continuous quantity we gathered a random selection 300 stones of various sizes. We threw them in a heap on the sand.
We looked at the heap of different stones and considered if they were all different sizes. Even though we knew they were all different there did seem to be a group that stood out as being the largest stones. We removed these quickly and without too much thought.
No sooner than this was done another group of the largest stones appeared. We removed these and placed them along the side of the bunch.
We repeated the exercise until the whole heap was sorted into seven bundles.
We repeated the exercise on numerous occasions over a twenty year period with different people. The consistency in the groupings may be seen as our inherent desire to break down continuous quantity into groups of size.
We understand this to be an expression of our intellect to simplify what is beyond our comprehension.
We reduced the bundle to 36 carefully graded stones from small to large. We worked the test again.
Immediately the largest type of size
appeared and was immediately removed.
The exercise was repeated until the
36 were sorted
A pattern seemed to emerge that Suggested the limits of people’scapacity to deal withcontinuous quantity
Continuous quantity as presented to us in nature was naturally broken down into (7 sizes)Smallest, very small, smallMediumLarge, larger, largest
There was debate as to the home of the smallest and largest in each group.
The debate covered the stones that occupied the boundaries and limits of the groupings
The original experiments undertaken by the Benedictine monks showed that the difference in size between corresponding stones in each group was in the ratio 3:4.
Handmade white cubes provided a vehicle for further experiment, the results however were not as convincing or accurate in the resulting proportions. This was because each consecutive block we made was not 1/24th larger than the previous one.
The ratio 3:4 produces a geometric series very similar to the Fibonacci series. This new series christened the ‘plastic number’ is slower and described as A+B=D.
The reason we think it is slower is due to the 3rd dimension in our experimental materials. The Fibonacci or Golden series (A+B=C) is based on the division of a 2D shape.
We experience built form in 3D. Therefore, we believe the lines and surfaces that generate the form should come under the spell of the plastic number measures and ratios
Music & Number
Most western music is written in one key. Each key has seven notes. It is universal and the limited number of notes doesn’t restrict creativity.
The Greeks, Palladio, Corbusier knew the importance of number and it’s relationship to harmony. Palladio set out the rooms in his villas using measures and proportions derived from a musical scale.
Architecture is like music in that it should bring joy and delight or be sombre and sad depending on how the building is to be used.
Regardless of the mood required it should have melody and harmony, order and rhythm, proportion and scale. Then it is peaceful and bright.
Intellect
Our intellects makes us different from the other creatures with whom we share the earth. We must use this ‘gift’ carefully when borrowing to provide for our existence.